🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few key adjustments:

• Each team includes just eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, this mode lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it gives additional choices for players seeking different methods to have fun with the game. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 fans are upset.

Community Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," comments a different user. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," and someone else lists everything they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

However, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who have lives and can't play this game 24/7. Let them find a middle ground," states another. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Concerns and Community Feedback

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase wait times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the community compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another describes this mode as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics indicates this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.